Harf,哈夫答记者问时，提到内政了吗？
就美国Ferguson骚乱，美国白宫新闻发言人哈夫女士答问时提到：thes is really a domestic issue。就其意思，看到国内很多网友在争论。尤其是有些网友认为，这里的domestic issue指的不是什么内政。为了弄清楚哈夫的意思，我先把这句话的前后文搬来：
MS. HARF: Well look, people are free to say whatever they want. That’s something we believe in very deeply here, is freedom of expression. But I would certainly strongly disagree with the notion that’s what’s happening here is comparable in any to situations in some of those countries you’ve named. As I said – and this is really a domestic issue – but briefly, when we have problems and issues in this country, we deal with them openly and honestly. We think that’s important, and I would encourage the countries you named particularly to do the same thing. They haven’t always done that, and we’ve been very clear when we believe they should.
字面的意思好懂。字缝里的纠缠不好懂。这里，我读出的文字后面的意思有：
1有些批评美国处置骚乱做法的国家，其国内也时有“骚乱”发生。对之，美国政府也经常批评；
2这次美国之受到批评，就言论自由而言，美国并不介意；
3但是，美国对某些国家内政事务的批评，其“内政事务”同美国这次内政事务，不能相提并论。美国这次骚乱事件，才是真正的内政事件；
4也就是说，这个事件你们可以说，但你们不要把它同美国经常说你们的内政事件相等看待；
5也就是说，你们或这些国家（指某大国，俄国等）发生美国这样类似的事情，我们不会去说；
6即使这样的真正的内政事务，美国政府也本公正透明方针处置。
总结一下，这里所谓内政或不干涉----或曰不评论内政，内政从字面上不是问题所在。什么是真正的内政，才是问题所在。
MS. HARF: Well look, people are free to say whatever they want. That’s something we believe in very deeply here, is freedom of expression. But I would certainly strongly disagree with the notion that’s what’s happening here is comparable in any to situations in some of those countries you’ve named. As I said – and this is really a domestic issue – but briefly, when we have problems and issues in this country, we deal with them openly and honestly. We think that’s important, and I would encourage the countries you named particularly to do the same thing. They haven’t always done that, and we’ve been very clear when we believe they should.
字面的意思好懂。字缝里的纠缠不好懂。这里，我读出的文字后面的意思有：
1有些批评美国处置骚乱做法的国家，其国内也时有“骚乱”发生。对之，美国政府也经常批评；
2这次美国之受到批评，就言论自由而言，美国并不介意；
3但是，美国对某些国家内政事务的批评，其“内政事务”同美国这次内政事务，不能相提并论。美国这次骚乱事件，才是真正的内政事件；
4也就是说，这个事件你们可以说，但你们不要把它同美国经常说你们的内政事件相等看待；
5也就是说，你们或这些国家（指某大国，俄国等）发生美国这样类似的事情，我们不会去说；
6即使这样的真正的内政事务，美国政府也本公正透明方针处置。
总结一下，这里所谓内政或不干涉----或曰不评论内政，内政从字面上不是问题所在。什么是真正的内政，才是问题所在。
楼主 ：wannian
时间：2014-08-22 18:03:29
整理一下。
就美国Ferguson骚乱，美国白宫新闻发言人哈夫女士答问时提到：thes is really a domestic issue。就其意思，看到国内很多网友在争论。尤其是有些网友认为，这里的domestic issue指的不是什么内政。为了弄清楚哈夫的意思，我先把这句话的前后文搬来：
MS. HARF: Well look, people are free to say whatever they want. That’s something we believe in very deeply here, is freedom of expression. But I would certainly strongly disagree with the notion that’s what’s happening here is comparable in any to situations in some of those countries you’ve named. As I said – and this is really a domestic issue – but briefly, when we have problems and issues in this country, we deal with them openly and honestly. We think that’s important, and I would encourage the countries you named particularly to do the same thing. They haven’t always done that, and we’ve been very clear when we believe they should.
字面的意思好懂。字缝里的纠缠不好懂。这里，我读出的文字后面的意思有：
1有些批评美国处置骚乱做法的国家，其国内也时有“骚乱”发生。对之，美国政府也经常批评；
2这次美国之受到批评，就言论自由而言，美国并不介意；
3但是，美国对某些国家内政事务的批评，其“内政事务”同美国这次内政事务，不能相提并论。美国这次骚乱事件，才是真正的内政事务（件）；
4也就是说，这个事件你们可以说，但你们不要把它同美国经常说你们的内政事件相等看待；
5也就是说，你们或这些国家（指某大国，俄国等）发生美国这样类似的事情，我们不会去说；
6即使这样的真正的内政事务（件），美国政府也本公正透明方针处置。
总结一下，这里所谓内政或不干涉----或曰不评论内务，内务从字面上不是问题所在。什么是真正！的内政事务，才是问题所在。据哈女士字面意思推测，美国此次真正内务是“小”的“局限”的，而字面下的意思有，那些不是真正的内务是大的，非局限的。
就美国Ferguson骚乱，美国白宫新闻发言人哈夫女士答问时提到：thes is really a domestic issue。就其意思，看到国内很多网友在争论。尤其是有些网友认为，这里的domestic issue指的不是什么内政。为了弄清楚哈夫的意思，我先把这句话的前后文搬来：
MS. HARF: Well look, people are free to say whatever they want. That’s something we believe in very deeply here, is freedom of expression. But I would certainly strongly disagree with the notion that’s what’s happening here is comparable in any to situations in some of those countries you’ve named. As I said – and this is really a domestic issue – but briefly, when we have problems and issues in this country, we deal with them openly and honestly. We think that’s important, and I would encourage the countries you named particularly to do the same thing. They haven’t always done that, and we’ve been very clear when we believe they should.
字面的意思好懂。字缝里的纠缠不好懂。这里，我读出的文字后面的意思有：
1有些批评美国处置骚乱做法的国家，其国内也时有“骚乱”发生。对之，美国政府也经常批评；
2这次美国之受到批评，就言论自由而言，美国并不介意；
3但是，美国对某些国家内政事务的批评，其“内政事务”同美国这次内政事务，不能相提并论。美国这次骚乱事件，才是真正的内政事务（件）；
4也就是说，这个事件你们可以说，但你们不要把它同美国经常说你们的内政事件相等看待；
5也就是说，你们或这些国家（指某大国，俄国等）发生美国这样类似的事情，我们不会去说；
6即使这样的真正的内政事务（件），美国政府也本公正透明方针处置。
总结一下，这里所谓内政或不干涉----或曰不评论内务，内务从字面上不是问题所在。什么是真正！的内政事务，才是问题所在。据哈女士字面意思推测，美国此次真正内务是“小”的“局限”的，而字面下的意思有，那些不是真正的内务是大的，非局限的。
